Thousands of bmw employees in the usa without being allowed

adminonOctober 15, 2021December 13, 2021Leave a Comment on Thousands of bmw employees in the usa without being allowed

The company had already on Monday (6. April 2020) informed that the production break in European and North American works will be required by the end of April. The reason is the world’s weak demand for cars. However, the associates receive the information, but further their agreed social benefits such as health insurance payments.

The step trap BMW not easy

The situation was allowed to stop until production will be resumed. A few thousands of employees are affected. BMW employed in the US plant in Spartanburg (South Carolina) around 11.000 employees. The step is not easy for the company, strolling it.

An a similar step had also made other carmakers in the US, including Tesla. An instrument such as the short-time acquisition of Europe known in Germany and other parts of Europe have not existed in the US, but with the US government’s economic aid, but limited unemployment assistance was expanded. Now employers should also be possible to vacuum for up to four months instead of dismissing them. During this time, the state was influenced by the salary.

In addition to BMW, the Volkswagen and Daimler’s wage replacement benefits are also used in European countries in addition to BMW in addition to the state of the state.

CategoriesHealth

News

Temporary work instead of an effortless hartz iv income

Josef Schlarmann, chairman of the Union for Small and Medium-Sized Businesses, intervenes in the welfare state debate

Effortless prosperity is not Hartz IV, says Dr. Josef Schlarmann, the chairman of the Union of Small and Medium-Sized Businesses (MIT). On the other hand, Schlarmann told Wirtschaftswoche that it is already an effortless income. Since this group earns its income at the expense of others, it is necessary to ask about those who can work but do not want to. The temporary employment industry should help in the search.

If possible, those who live on social benefits should also provide something in return – this basic idea runs through large parts of the current debate on the future of the welfare state in Germany. The idea of providing this service in return in the form of social work in the communities has been a topic of discussion again in the SPD since Hannelore Kraft. In principle, there is agreement between the black-yellow-red coalition on this ie, although there are differences when it comes to the specifics.

While the Social Democrats are talking about job offers that can be accepted voluntarily, Schlarmann sees solidarity as a "Mutual obligation" and demands that the already existing regulation, which obliges Hartz IV recipients to accept any reasonable job, be implemented more consistently. According to Schlarmann, temporary employment agencies could also offer jobs in addition to the municipalities.

In an interview with Telepolis, Josef Schlarmann confirmed his ideas. His proposal to include the temporary employment industry was a reaction to the criticism of the social welfare associations that the municipalities could not provide these jobs at all. However, since he wanted Hartz IV recipients to receive a job offer as soon as possible in the future, the temporary employment industry should fill the existing gap. "We have a temporary employment industry that is well versed in the placement of workers. And of course not only in the placement, but also in the further education and preparation of workers for their future job. Why shouldn’t we go down this private road to solve the problem??", said Schlarmann to Telepolis.

The idea is not new: Hans-Werner Sinn is also a proponent of this combination of municipal employment and increased involvement of the temporary employment industry in the placement of workers. "Extraordinarily sensible" is the concept of the ifo president. Because experience shows that "Unemployed people who apply for Hartz IV immediately withdraw their application if they are immediately offered a job (about 15 percent)" were. The MIT chairman expects this to ease the burden on the public budget.

A model sees Schlarmann thereby in Sweden. This country is always a role model only when it comes to nationalization, he criticizes. But the Swedes went a completely different way. "In Swedish municipalities, many tasks are carried out privately, by private companies," asks Schlarmann. The administration only sets up and monitors the measures and sets the legal framework. But the implementation is completely in private hands."

Schlarmann does not fear that the expansion of municipal employment and temporary work will encourage wage dumping. He is primarily concerned with charitable and municipal work in the social sector. "How many handicraft enterprises have I there still, which are active there?", asks Schlarmann and immediately answers the question himself: "Maybe that’s a gardening company that gets a contract from the municipality to keep the local grounds in order." But that, according to MIT’s president, cannot be the reason for leaving a major problem unresolved. Simple jobs, such as transporting, raking or sweeping, are hard to fill at the moment, he says. According to Schlarmann, ALG II recipients could in future be placed in these jobs via temporary employment agencies. Also in the care this is conceivable in such ranges, in which no trained care workers were needed. Here, the previously unemployed could accompany elderly people on walks, help them clean up or do cleaning work.

Schlarmann is convinced of the necessity of his proposals: "The astonishing thing is, and this shows me that the path is the right one, that our social associations do not want this because a piece of their competence would be lost. Yet this step could be very successful." After all, this would create competition in this sector as well and benchmark.

But not only the social associations, but also the employees in this field were allowed to be skeptical about Schlarmann’s demands. Finally, an expansion of the labor supply in the care sector has increased the prere on the professionals employed there – attempts to circumvent the minimum wage in the care sector of 7.50 in the east and 8.50 in the west, which will apply from July 2010, by using low-skilled temporary workers seem conceivable.

Schlarmann himself speaks out against the minimum wage in the care sector. This was "Pure protectionism" and displace "unwelcome competitors out of the care market". For Schlarmann is certain: "The minimum nursing wage ignores the fact that there is a growing nursing market in Germany that offers nursing services below the agreed minimum wage." The expansion of temporary work seems to be a means of "Competitive disadvantages for private providers" to compensate.

News

Where cowboys shudder

May George W. Holding hands with Abdullah?

"Why do they hate us?" No other question so preoccupied the American public after the World Trade Center attacks as this one. The government tried by all means to get to the bottom of it. Sent hundreds of thousands of peace researchers to those countries where they tried to get to the root of the hatred, invested millions of dollars in "public diplomacy", to improve the image and failed so far. Neither the "Enduring Freedom"-Mission, nor the "Iraqi Liberation"-Mission, nor al-Hurra brought the decisive turnaround. The popularity of the Americans, especially their government, among the Arab population is still poor, as poll results have shown for several years now. Now the boss has taken matters into his own hands.

The mission, the terror and the love of the next: George W. Bush takes the matter seriously. And stays cool. A certain becoming is not to be denied to him, even if his compatriots often want to see it differently

It’s often said of Robert de Niro that no matter who he plays, whether a weeping mobster or a family man in a hobby basement, his characters always exude were. The same can now be said of the American president. He had several lately "major performances" and has brought them over the stage in a way that is hard to beat for coolness. At the late pope’s funeral ceremony, no one mastered the complicated Catholic emotional act between pious devotion and simultaneous distraction by the grandeur of the theatrical surroundings as well as George W. Bush. His face documented emotion and at the same time curiosity for the Roman sky, the coffin and the crowd in St. Peter’s Square.

And then the appearance the day before yesterday: the president, with a slightly embarrassed expression, but unwaveringly holding the hand of a tyrant from the Orient. And yesterday he showed his compatriots, who have not cared about the colors for a long time (cf. Orange Alert) grief, which indicates their country’s terror threat status, how seriously he takes even innocuous warnings and holed up in his bunker after radar reported a flock of birds over the White House. According to informed circles, the president hoards on his iPod songs by musicians who hate him, they are even said to be his favorite songs (cf. "Show me your ipod – and I’ll tell you what kind of person you are!"). How cool is that?

However, one knows it long ago, the USA are divided into two rough camps. Not everyone found the act with 81-year-old Abdullah from Saudi Arabia "appropriate". Official America does not go easy on physical displays of affection: Can the leader of the free world hold hands with the evil dictator, from whose empire 15 of the 19 assassins of 11/11 came?.September, which finances Islamists around the world, walk around in parks – like a "fucking turtledove"? wonders, for example, a blogger for the American magazine "Reason".

The late-night comedian Jay Leno performed the walk of the unequal couple in slow motion and provided musical accompaniment to the clip "Up Where We Belong". Reactions from the conservative heartland of the United States have yet to come, but the neocon New York Post has already summed up the presumed trend in a catchy phrase:

Cowboys all across the Lone Star state must be shuddering

The blogosphere, on the other hand, has had to be more enlightened and progressive. Of course, there is a considerable amount of condemnable homophobia in all the mockery of the hand-holding head of state, but a few paragraphs further on, a crude "But" to make a statue of itself:

I don’t give much of a damn about Saudi traditions. If it is the custom for heads of state there to liquefy food and smoke hookahs, and we decide to adapt as guests, I don’t care. But should our president dictate the customs when he travels to Saudi Arabia as a guest?? Such as shaking hands with unveiled women and chatting with them in public? To dance? And I wonder what effect these lovebird images actually have on jihad sympathizers in the Arab world. Oh, no wait, I don’t wonder about that.

Justin Logan, member of the Cato Institute

Naturally also the obvious pragmatic reasons are mentioned, for which number 43 put his hand into the fire, furs ol naturlich. This was not a handshake, a caller to CNN is quoted as saying, the president squeezed the hand of the crown prince to print the oil price. Or maybe it was after all hindsight and cool, responsive presence of mind that made it possible for the sporty George W. made it possible to save the decrepit Abdullah from falling down. Cool effort in any case, carry on!

The step trap BMW not easy

Leave a Reply Cancel reply